What is wrong with Pearl? This question has intrigued many readers since the publication of Pearl S. Buck’s classic novel in 1931. Set in the Chinese countryside during the early 20th century, the story revolves around a young girl named Pearl, whose unconventional upbringing and complex relationships with her parents and community have sparked a myriad of debates and discussions over the years.
Pearl, the protagonist of the novel, is a character that has been both praised and criticized for her unique traits and behaviors. Critics argue that what is wrong with Pearl lies in her rebellious nature and the challenges she poses to traditional societal norms. They contend that her unconventional lifestyle and her defiance of her parents’ wishes are indicative of a character that is difficult to relate to and understand.
On the other hand, supporters of Pearl argue that her character is a representation of the struggle for individuality and freedom in a restrictive society. They believe that what is wrong with Pearl is not her actions, but rather the oppressive environment she is forced to navigate. In this perspective, Pearl’s defiance and independence are commendable qualities that should be celebrated rather than criticized.
One of the main criticisms of Pearl is her lack of respect for her parents and her disregard for their wishes. Throughout the novel, Pearl’s parents struggle to understand and control her behavior, which often leads to conflict and tension within the family. Critics argue that Pearl’s rebelliousness is a sign of disrespect and a lack of gratitude towards her parents, who have done so much for her.
However, supporters of Pearl argue that her parents’ expectations and values are outdated and oppressive. They believe that Pearl’s struggle against her parents’ wishes is a necessary step towards self-discovery and personal growth. In this sense, what is wrong with Pearl is not her actions, but the societal constraints that limit her potential.
Another point of contention is Pearl’s relationship with her father, who is portrayed as a weak and ineffective leader. Critics argue that Pearl’s affection for her father is misplaced, as he fails to provide her with the guidance and support she needs. They believe that what is wrong with Pearl is her inability to recognize her father’s flaws and her continued loyalty to him despite his shortcomings.
In contrast, supporters of Pearl argue that her love for her father is a testament to her capacity for empathy and understanding. They believe that Pearl’s relationship with her father is complex and multifaceted, and that her affection for him is a reflection of her deep emotional ties to her family. In this view, what is wrong with Pearl is not her love for her father, but the societal expectations that pressure her to conform to a specific image of family life.
In conclusion, the question of what is wrong with Pearl is a complex and multifaceted one. While critics argue that her rebellious nature and disregard for traditional values are problematic, supporters of Pearl believe that her character is a representation of the struggle for individuality and freedom in a restrictive society. Whether or not one agrees with the assessment of Pearl’s character, it is clear that her story continues to resonate with readers and provoke thought on the nature of family, society, and personal growth.
